Tuesday, November 25, 2014

Fluoride Contamination


The research behind fluoride began in 1901 when Frederick McKay opened up a dental practice in Colorado Springs, Colorado. Many of the Colorado Springs natives had brown stains on their teeth. The meaning behind these mysterious stains were discovered by McKay and Dr. G.V. Black.


They discovered that the stains were from developmental imperfections in children’s teeth. However, the people with these brown stains were resistant to tooth decay also. McKay developed a theory that the water the residents were drinking could have something to do with blackening of the teeth.
So McKay ordered the town to drink from another water supply and within a few years, the black stains disappeared. After running many tests on the water, the end found out that it had high levels of fluoride.
Further studies show that even though high levels of fluorosis mottles tooth enamel, it lower levels prevented tooth decay without the staining. Consequently, in 1999, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention named water fluoridation as one of the top ten greatest public health achievements.
Fluoride is most commonly known to be found in drinking water to promote dental health but is also found in toothpaste and tooth products. It mixes with tooth enamel when teeth are growing, decreasing the chance for tooth decay. Exposure to excessive consumption of it  can lead to a likelihood of bone fractures. Only 50-60% of fluoride is excreted by the kidneys. The rest accumulates in the body, where is calcifies in tissues and bones. There are villages in India where people are crippled by fluorosis of the bone due to small amounts of fluoride. It just accumulated.  This amount of fluoride increases steadily over a lifetime. It can be turned into fluoride toxicity which causes early symptoms of gastrointestinal pain, nausea, vomiting, and headaches. Even a small dose of 01. To 0.3 mg/kg of fluoride can produce these symptoms. 1-3mg of fluoride is found in 1-3g of toothpaste, which is less than 3% of the tube
Fluoride can have a negative effect on the human brain. As of May 16, 2013, there were 37 cases associated with the decrease of IQs in children and the increase of fluoride exposure. A Harvard team of scientists found that high fluoride exposure reduced the “standardized mean difference” by 0.45 reduction which is equivalent to seven IQ points. Of course this is with high levels of fluoride, but 1.4 million Americans drink this amount every day. Many people are intoxicated through toothpastes and high fluoride concentration in drinking water.
The reason that there is a warning sign on toothpastes saying “WARNING: Keep out of reach of children under 6 years of age. If you accidentally swallow more than used for brushing, seek professional help or contact a poison control center immediately,” is due to the levels of fluoride contained inside the paste. The environmental protection agency has even stated that fluoride has “substantial evidence of developmental neurotoxicity”. There have been over 100 animal experiments that show a negative impact on the fluoride on the brain.    This chart shows the amount that children consume in toothpaste.

Amount of Bubblegum-flavored “Colgate for Kids” Toothpaste
Capable of Causing Acute Toxicity 
Age of Child
Average Weight*
Milligrams of Fluoride
Capable of Producing
Symptoms
Grams of Ingested Toothpaste
Percent of Toothpaste
Volume
2 years
~12 kg
1.2 – 3.6 mg
1.1 – 3.3 g
0.8 – 2.5%
3 years
~15 kg
1.5 – 4.5 mg
1.4 – 4.1 g
1.0 – 3.1%
4 years
~16 kg
1.6 – 4.8 mg
1.5 – 4.4 g
1.1 – 3.4%
5 years
~ 18 kg
1.8 – 5.4 mg
1.6 – 4.9 g
1.3 – 3.8%
6 years
~20 kg
2.0 – 6.0 mg
1.8 – 5.5 g
1.4 – 4.2%
7 years
~22 kg
2.2 – 6.6 mg
2.0 – 6.0 g
1.5 – 4.6%
8 years
~25 kg
2.5 – 7.5 mg
2.3 – 6.8 g
1.7 – 5.2%
9 years
~28 kg
2.8 – 8.4 mg
2.5 – 7.6 g
2.0 – 5.9%
*Average weight data obtained here
** The fluoride concentration in Colgate for Kids toothpaste is 1,100 ppm. At 130 grams of paste 
What is scary is that most children consumed the near amount of toxic fluoride from their toothpaste.  This chart shows the number of reports to poison control centers in the US due to the intoxication of fluoride through toothpaste.



http://bretthesterdmd.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/colgate.jpeg
Reports to Poison Control Centers in U.S.
Due to Excessive Ingestion of Fluoride Toothpastes
Data from: Bronstein (2009, 2010) & Watson (2003)
# Treated in
Emergency Room
Medical Outcome*
Year
Product
# Reports
None
Minor
Moderate
Major
Death
2009
F Toothpaste
24,547
378
4,781
1,146
42
2
0
2008
F Toothpaste
23,468
383
4,395
1,119
43
1
0
2002
F Toothpaste
24,087
411
4,852
1,218
40
1
1
As you can see, the impact of fluoride toxicity exists.
Fluoride does not only effect humans. The fluoride compound placed in drinking water dissolves easily into the ground and into bodies of water where the water is purified for human consumption. But not all the water is used, of course, for human consumption. A lot of it enters many ecosystems.
We have to keep our environment in mind when treating our water systems. Fluoride toxicity to aquatic invertebrate and fish increase with the concentration and exposure time. It has been over 45 years since we have been treating our water systems and the exposure time has exponentially increased. A fluoride concentration as low as 0.5 mg can affect invertebrates and fish in a negative way. Why should we care? By impacting our fish, we impact our ecosystem and indirectly, impact our lives. An ecosystem is very frail and we must not destroy it with our added chemicals.
The safe drinking water act was passed in 1975 through congress. This is a law that requires the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to determine the levels of water contaminants. The maximum contaminant level for fluoride is 4.0mg/L or 4.0 ppm. If the contamination of fluoride increases past this limit, the EPA must reduce its concentration.
However, we live in a capitalistic environment and sometimes the regulation of a chemical can take longer than ideal to promote. It can take up to 3 months to a year to have the EPA make its final decision to reduce a certain amount of fluoride in water. This is especially because it is expensive to remove fluoride from drinking water. The water must undergoes reverse osmosis or distillation.
So why does the government not shut down the usage of fluoride? The mindset is that all substances are poisonous at a certain level, thus not using them would really make no difference. The positive impacts of fluoride does out way the negative, but we must understand that the usage of fluoride is still new. We still do not know what the long term effects are and only are starting to realize them through the brain, case studies, ecological factors, etc… The regulation of fluoride through EPA is important but it needs to be better regulated so that the reduction in high concentrations can be reduced before people are intoxicated.
Works cited:




No comments:

Post a Comment