Emerging as a modification of nicotine, neonicotinoids, or "neonics", are a class of pesticide often used in corn, maize, soya, and canola farming, as well as in protective seed coats. Imidacloprid is the most commonly used neonic of the seven types available: imidacloprid, acetamiprid, clothianidin, thiacloprid, dinotefuran, nitenpyram and thiamethoxam. Farmers spend over $2.6 billion on neonicotinoids, as they comprise 25% of the global pesticide market and 80% of seed treatments, though users are often not aware of their potential risks.
Neonicotinoids were created as a safer alternative to other, more notoriously dangerous chemicals, pegged as more selective and not harmful to humans or mammals. Like most pesticides, though, the effects go far beyond the target species. Chemical secretions in the leaves, flowers, tissues, and pollen of plants can appear up to six months after exposure, and ground water contamination can reach such high levels that the fluid could be used as a pesticide itself. Insects, the initial victims, are affected negatively by this. The aquatic invertebrate population, for instance, has decreased in variety and abundance by 70%. Birds and amphibians are consequently influenced by the decline in insect numbers, lacking safe food sources and dying as well. There is a correlation between water contamination and insect-eating bird population, demonstrating the close link among ecological entities and the tendency for toxins to run up the food chain.
The figure above (Alternatives Journal) illustrates the interconnectivity of organisms in the spread of chemical toxins.
One of the most well-known and imminently threatening effects of neonicotinoid poisoning is in the honeybee population. Colony Collapse Disorder is an increasing problem as bee-keepers continue to lose colonies. During the winter of 2012-2013, Ontario lost 70% of its bee colonies, alongside an overall 30% loss, or 200,000 colonies, in Canada as a whole. Pollinators contribute $200 billion in ecological services and are essential to food production and agricultural success, so a lack of bees would be catastrophic. Though clearly there are other factors at play as well, pesticide use cannot be ignored as both one of the most prominent and preventable.
Specifically, neonicotinoids increase acetylcholinesterase action in the nervous system of the bees, overstimulating synaptic activity. The chemical binds to post-synaptic nicotinic receptors and causes continuous, nonstop signaling that leads to death. This phenomenon can be used as an indicator of neonicotinoid poisoning.
Despite experimental evidence of neonicotinoids' detriments, few regulations have been put into place. The EPA is currently reviewing all aspects of the chemical, which is great, but in the meantime the government has failed to pass legislation to suspend its usage, with the exception of President Obama's Pollinator Task Force to promote protective strategies. There is activity overseas as well. Though the UK initially voted against it and received a lot of criticism, the European Union finally approved a two year ban on specific neonicotinoids until further research has been done. Unfortunately, pesticide companies are providing a lot of the research, which will most likely detract from its objectivity.
Companies like Syngenta and Bayer, which distribute neonicotinoids, deny harmful effects on humans and animals, rejecting the idea that the chemicals are unsafe and filing legally against any bans. They also often ignore evidence from bee-keepers, claiming that it is not grounded enough or too subjective. As usual, the issue comes down to a power dichotomy and hesitation to make dramatic changes to the industry.
(Alternatives Journal)
Products containing neonicotinoids are still on the market, including in Home Depot and Lowes. Application recommendations on these items often exceed that which would be used in agriculture by 100 times, though the consumer probably would not know the difference.
At this point, little is known about the adverse effects of neonicotinoids on humans. Since nicotine has negative bodily repercussions, neonicotinoids probably do, too, especially in children, and poisoning reports are becoming more frequent. But we must think past our own health. Decreases in insect populations, especially in pollinators, will soon haunt the globe as food production grows problematic and endangering of bird and amphibian species takes place. The EPA should definitely continue its research, and hopefully other organizations will catch on soon.
Sources:
Boily, Monique, et al. "Acetylcholinesterase in Honey Bees ( Apis Mellifera) Exposed to Neonicotinoids, Atrazine and Glyphosate: Laboratory and Field Experiments." Environmental Science & Pollution Research20.8 (2013): 5603-14. Web.
Dolesh, Richard J. "What's Killing our Birds and Bees?" Parks & Recreation 49.7 : 30. Web.
Forrester, M. B. "Neonicotinoid Insecticide Exposures Reported to Six Poison Centers in Texas." Human & experimental toxicology 33.6 (2014): 568-73. Web.
"Honeybees in Denial." Alternatives Journal 40 (2014): 10. Academic OneFile; Gale. Web.
"In the News." TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry 61.0 (2014): iv-x. Web.
Koo, Hyun-Na, et al. "Regional Susceptibilities to 12 Insecticides of Melon and Cotton Aphid, Aphis Gossypii (Hemiptera: Aphididae) and a Point Mutation Associated with Imidacloprid Resistance." Crop Protection 55.0 (2014): 91-7. Web.
Lin, Pei-Chen, et al. "Acute Poisoning with Neonicotinoid Insecticides: A Case Report and Literature Review." Basic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology 112.4 (2013): 282-6. Web.
Long, Cheryl. "Nursery Plants Contain Bee-Killing Chemicals." Mother Earth News.262 (2014): 21. Web.
McCoy, Terrence. "A Possible Reason Millions of Bees are Dying." The Washington Post07/10; 2014/11 2014. Science in Context; Gale. Web. <http://ic.galegroup.com/ic/scic/NewsDetailsPage/NewsDetailsWindow?failOverType=&query=&prodId=SCIC&windowstate=normal&contentModules=&display-query=&mode=view&displayGroupName=News&limiter=&currPage=&disableHighlighting=false&displayGroups=&sortBy=&search_within_results=&p=SCIC&action=e&catId=&activityType=&scanId=&documentId=GALE%7CA374576821&source=Bookmark&u=connc_main&jsid=5a37c273bc081dafa933e9ed03aa423f>.
"Neonicotinoids." Alternatives Journal 39 (2013): 11. Academic OneFile; Gale. Web.
"Risking another Silent Spring." The New York Times: NA(L). 07/01; 2014/11 2014. Science in Context; Gale. Web. <http://ic.galegroup.com/ic/scic/NewsDetailsPage/NewsDetailsWindow?failOverType=&query=&prodId=SCIC&windowstate=normal&contentModules=&display-query=&mode=view&displayGroupName=News&limiter=&currPage=&disableHighlighting=false&displayGroups=&sortBy=&search_within_results=&p=SCIC&action=e&catId=&activityType=&scanId=&documentId=GALE%7CA373311322&source=Bookmark&u=connc_main&jsid=8be7a9c7533d64f2e0c19a66eccf3e84>.
"UK Bee Plea." New Scientist 223.2980 (2014): 7. Web.
"United States : EPA Finds Neonicotinoid Seed Treatments of Little Or no Benefit to U.S. Soybean Production." Mena Report10/17; 2014/11 2014. Global Reference on the Environment, Energy, and Natural Resources; Gale. Web. <http://find.galegroup.com/grnr/infomark.do?&source=gale&idigest=f2601c723b20175def579f6e35edf1e2&prodId=GRNR&userGroupName=connc_main&tabID=T004&docId=A386358319&type=retrieve&PDFRange=%5B%5D&contentSet=IAC-Documents&version=1.0>.








